<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for one cool site: wordpress blogging tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Become a Better Blogger 3 - Ethics and Links by Shefaly</title>
		<link>http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/how-to-become-a-better-blogger-3-ethics-and-links/#comment-4144</link>
		<dc:creator>Shefaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com/?p=644#comment-4144</guid>
		<description>Good points - it would be good if we could find, out of the 100M or so blogs tracked by Technorati, at least 100 blogs where every single post can stand up to scrutiny under the 'evidence' and 'reasoning' headers. 

The only times I have had 'arguments' in the blogosphere have been when I have challenged the evidence for being skewed a certain way and when the reasoning is loose and even fallacious. But then not everyone writing in the blogosphere has a graduate degree... :-)

I mean seriously, these are ideal guidelines, but I really would love to know more bloggers who write in line with these tests of honesty, evidential balance and reasoning. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points - it would be good if we could find, out of the 100M or so blogs tracked by Technorati, at least 100 blogs where every single post can stand up to scrutiny under the &#8216;evidence&#8217; and &#8216;reasoning&#8217; headers. </p>
<p>The only times I have had &#8216;arguments&#8217; in the blogosphere have been when I have challenged the evidence for being skewed a certain way and when the reasoning is loose and even fallacious. But then not everyone writing in the blogosphere has a graduate degree&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I mean seriously, these are ideal guidelines, but I really would love to know more bloggers who write in line with these tests of honesty, evidential balance and reasoning. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to remove data from Google&#8217;s cache by timethief</title>
		<link>http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/how-to-remove-data-from-googles-cache/#comment-4143</link>
		<dc:creator>timethief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com/?p=310#comment-4143</guid>
		<description>The 404's (page not found) that I have removed using this method were gone within days of my request for deletion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 404&#8217;s (page not found) that I have removed using this method were gone within days of my request for deletion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
